PLAINTIFF IS, AND ALL TIMES MENTIONED IN THIS COMPLAINT IS DEMETRIOS POULAKAS ESQUIRE. MOTION IS TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.
United States District Court Central District of California’s Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the events giving rise to this complaint happened in this district. I am also suing the U.S. Government and federal officials in the New York FBI Unit (exhibit one). I have been living as a resistant of this district for Seventeen Years Since 1995.
FEDERAL MATTER JURISDICTION
Federal Matter Jurisdiction 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Plaintiff’s Case Belongs in Federal Court because this case involves Federal Law: Suing the U.S. Government and federal officials in the New York FBI Unit (exhibit one), for corrupting and controlling The Los Angeles City Government, and The New York City Government in premeditating a series of Repetitive crimes in Three States (documents have already been submitted, and verbally stated in court).
RICO: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations is defined as a pattern of racketeering activity connected to an enterprise (ergo facto “The Crime Syndicate” the criminal operatives/defendants 1990-2013 re: complaint attachment).
The law defines 35 offenses as constituting racketeering, including gambling, murder, kidnapping, arson, drug dealing, bribery, mail and wire fraud to name a few. These crimes are known as “predicate” offenses. To charge under RICO, at least two predicate crimes within 10 years have been committed through this criminal enterprise (satanic crime syndicate, 1990-2013).
RICO crimes can be either civil or criminal depending on the type of activity and their punishment is enforced by international, federal and state laws.
The law stipulates that individuals who have sustained injury to property or business due to racketeering activity may sue and are entitled to threefold the amount of their losses.
VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY
The Defendants (crime syndicate operatives’) had satanic spies in all of the 14 buildings were me and members of my family had reside since Peer Music 1990. This was documented in this Case, and in two other related cases, their M.O.’s were to sequence the crimes which are evidenced.
The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States ensures that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
The Ninth Amendment declares that the fact that a right is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution does not mean that the government can infringe on that right. The Supreme Court recognized the Fourteenth Amendment as providing a substantive due process right to privacy.
This has caused the Plaintiff Demetrios Poulakas (and the people of this district) great Pain and Suffering, and sustained injury to business and career since 1990 Peer Music.
Diversity Jurisdiction 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The Plaintiff and some of the Defendants’ are from different States (exhibit one). I am suing Defendants’ from different states, and the amount that I am suing is over $75,000, 3,000,000 in total to be exact.
The Defendants crimes were evidenced in California and are residents and citizens of California. Some of the Defendants have consented to being sued and risked being sued for their actions in California, and for causing great harm to the Plaintiff Demetrios Poulakas.
Therefore because of all these reasons and facts the Motion to Transfer Case to United States District Court Central District of California must be Granted.
DATE THIS MARCH 25, 2013:
PO Box 123
Hollywood, Ca. 90078
Tel. #: 323-960-8253.